| To: | Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: mips32 kernel memory mapping |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Sat, 24 Jul 2004 02:32:44 +0200 |
| Cc: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>, Srinivas Kommu <kommu@hotmail.com>, Linux/MIPS Development <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.GSO.4.58.0407232233430.13094@waterleaf.sonytel.be> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <BAY1-F25sCR6nWqNG2Y00092cf9@hotmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58L.0407231348580.5644@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <20040723202439.GA3711@linux-mips.org> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0407232233430.13094@waterleaf.sonytel.be> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 10:34:35PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > There are still improvments to be made for BCM1250 support. Somebody > > thought scattering the first 1GB of memory through the lowest 4GB of > > physical address space like a three year old his toys over the floor > > was a good thing ... The resulting holes in the memory map are wasting > > significant amounts of memory for unused memory; the worst case number > > that is reached for 64-bit kernel on a system with > 1GB of RAM is 96MB! > > Perhaps you want to start using virtually mapped zones, like m68k? We could do that, yes. In the cases that would gain most such as the BCM1250 it'd not be possible though - there simply is not enough virtual address space left in KSEG2/3. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch] MIPS/gcc: Revert removal of DImode shifts for 32-bit targets, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Octane news, Stanislaw Skowronek |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: mips32 kernel memory mapping, Geert Uytterhoeven |
| Next by Thread: | Re: mips32 kernel memory mapping, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |