| To: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch] MIPS/gcc: Revert removal of DImode shifts for 32-bit targets |
| From: | Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 23 Jul 2004 13:27:03 -0700 |
| Cc: | Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.55.0407201505330.14824@jurand.ds.pg.gda.pl> |
| Mail-followup-to: | Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>, Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.55.0407191648451.3667@jurand.ds.pg.gda.pl> <87hds49bmo.fsf@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0407191907300.3667@jurand.ds.pg.gda.pl> <20040719213801.GD14931@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0407201505330.14824@jurand.ds.pg.gda.pl> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 04:41:35PM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > OK -- but then is there any way to convince gcc to embed a "static > inline" version of these functions instead of emitting a call? No. > Sometimes putting these eight (or nine for ashrdi3) instructions > inline would be a performance win. Sometimes, maybe. I suspect you'll find that in general it's nothing but bloat. r~ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: mips32 kernel memory mapping, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: mips32 kernel memory mapping, Geert Uytterhoeven |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch] MIPS/gcc: Revert removal of DImode shifts for 32-bit targets, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch] MIPS/gcc: Revert removal of DImode shifts for 32-bit targets, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |