linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP...

To: cgd@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP...
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 17:42:42 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, ddaney@avtrex.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com>
In-reply-to: <yov5k6x0vxca.fsf@ldt-sj3-010.sj.broadcom.com>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <200406281519.IAA29663@mail-sj1-2.sj.broadcom.com> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0407191612160.3667@jurand.ds.pg.gda.pl> <mailpost.1090246948.15046@news-sj1-1> <yov5k6x0vxca.fsf@ldt-sj3-010.sj.broadcom.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 cgd@broadcom.com wrote:

> At Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:22:29 +0000 (UTC), "Maciej W. Rozycki" wrote:
> > (this has led to an address shift enlarging the
> > patch significantly, unfortunately).
> 
> maybe add nops to pad, instead?

 Well, addresses have been shifted down, so you'd have to remove 
something.  I suppose the break tests could be moved to the end of file, 
but I fail to see an advantage.  Test cases that embed addresses in output 
patterns are doomed to suffer from such changes.

  Maciej

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>