linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP...

To: macro@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP...
From: cgd@broadcom.com
Date: 19 Jul 2004 08:19:17 -0700
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, ddaney@avtrex.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, "Ralf Baechle" <ralf@linux-mips.org>, "Richard Sandiford" <rsandifo@redhat.com>
In-reply-to: <mailpost.1090246948.15046@news-sj1-1>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <200406281519.IAA29663@mail-sj1-2.sj.broadcom.com> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0407191612160.3667@jurand.ds.pg.gda.pl> <mailpost.1090246948.15046@news-sj1-1>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
At Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:22:29 +0000 (UTC), "Maciej W. Rozycki" wrote:
> (this has led to an address shift enlarging the
> patch significantly, unfortunately).

maybe add nops to pad, instead?


cgd


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>