[Top] [All Lists]

Re: possible overflow in __udelay

Subject: Re: possible overflow in __udelay
From: Atsushi Nemoto <>
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 00:12:07 +0900 (JST)
In-reply-to: <>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <>
>>>>> On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 23:57:23 +0900 (JST), Atsushi Nemoto 
>>>>> <> said:

anemo> I believe, for example, mdelay(10) does not work properly on
anemo> most MIPS ports (except for DECSTATION and JAZZ which have
anemo> smaller HZ value).

Oops, mdelay(10) should work.  But mdelay(5) (mdelay(MAX_UDELAY_MS))
does not work.

Atsushi Nemoto

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>