| To: | Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.4 pci_dma_sync_sg fix |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Thu, 1 Jul 2004 15:59:19 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20040701.224535.71082878.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20040701.222120.41626500.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <20040701132240.GA6219@linux-mips.org> <20040701.224535.71082878.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 10:45:35PM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 15:22:40 +0200, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> > >>>>> said: > > ralf> Leave the #ifdef stuff there - or otherwise gcc might optimize > ralf> this into empty loops ... > > The loop contains paranoid out_of_line_bug, so it never be optimized > to empty. Indeed and I think that's a bit of overkill. I've never seen these assertions catch any bugs - and 2.4 isn't exactly new anymore. Anyway, even if the loop was empty gcc would not eleminate it. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.4 pci_dma_sync_sg fix, Atsushi Nemoto |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Please confirm your request to join movaznaustva, Yahoo! Groups |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.4 pci_dma_sync_sg fix, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.4 pci_dma_sync_sg fix, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |