linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP...

To: cgd@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP...
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:36:24 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, ddaney@avtrex.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, rsandifo@redhat.com
In-reply-to: <200406281519.IAA29663@mail-sj1-2.sj.broadcom.com>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <200406281519.IAA29663@mail-sj1-2.sj.broadcom.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 cgd@broadcom.com wrote:

> personally, i'd make the comment on the 'break' testcase in mips32.s a bit
> clearer and more explicit.  e.g. "for a while, break for mips32 
> took a 20 bit code.  But that was incompatible and caused problems, so
> now it's back to the old 10 bit code, or two comma-separated 10 bit codes."

 No problem.

> Otherwise, people might look and say "huh?"

 ;-)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>