Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP...

["Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>]

On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 cgd@broadcom.com wrote:

> personally, i'd make the comment on the 'break' testcase in mips32.s a bit
> clearer and more explicit.  e.g. "for a while, break for mips32 
> took a 20 bit code.  But that was incompatible and caused problems, so
> now it's back to the old 10 bit code, or two comma-separated 10 bit codes."

 No problem.

> Otherwise, people might look and say "huh?"

 ;-)