linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP...

To: cgd@broadcom.com, macro@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP...
From: cgd@broadcom.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:19:38 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, ddaney@avtrex.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, rsandifo@redhat.com
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
personally, i'd make the comment on the 'break' testcase in mips32.s a bit
clearer and more explicit.  e.g. "for a while, break for mips32 
took a 20 bit code.  But that was incompatible and caused problems, so
now it's back to the old 10 bit code, or two comma-separated 10 bit codes."

Otherwise, people might look and say "huh?"


chris


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>