| To: | macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP... |
| From: | cgd@broadcom.com |
| Date: | 24 Jun 2004 11:46:53 -0700 |
| Cc: | "Richard Sandiford" <rsandifo@redhat.com>, "David Daney" <ddaney@avtrex.com>, "Ralf Baechle" <ralf@linux-mips.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com |
| In-reply-to: | <mailpost.1088102121.25381@news-sj1-1> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <40C9F5A4.2050606@avtrex.com> <40C9F5FE.8030607@avtrex.com> <40C9F7F0.50501@avtrex.com> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0406112039040.13062@jurand.ds.pg.gda.pl> <mailpost.1086981251.16853@news-sj1-1> <yov57juduc7q.fsf@ldt-sj3-010.sj.broadcom.com> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0406222304340.23178@jurand.ds.pg.gda.pl> <87y8mdgryp.fsf@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0406242031020.8569@jurand.ds.pg.gda.pl> <mailpost.1088102121.25381@news-sj1-1> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
At Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:35:21 +0000 (UTC), "Maciej W. Rozycki" wrote: > Well, this is essentially what the patch does. Or do you mean: "drop it > and if anyone screams, consider an alternative?" I'd find it acceptable, > actually, but it's not my opinion that really matters here. (it's fine w/ me.) |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP..., Maciej W. Rozycki |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: non-contiguous physical memory, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP..., Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP..., Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |