linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP...

To: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl
Subject: Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP...
From: cgd@broadcom.com
Date: 24 Jun 2004 11:46:53 -0700
Cc: "Richard Sandiford" <rsandifo@redhat.com>, "David Daney" <ddaney@avtrex.com>, "Ralf Baechle" <ralf@linux-mips.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <mailpost.1088102121.25381@news-sj1-1>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <40C9F5A4.2050606@avtrex.com> <40C9F5FE.8030607@avtrex.com> <40C9F7F0.50501@avtrex.com> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0406112039040.13062@jurand.ds.pg.gda.pl> <mailpost.1086981251.16853@news-sj1-1> <yov57juduc7q.fsf@ldt-sj3-010.sj.broadcom.com> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0406222304340.23178@jurand.ds.pg.gda.pl> <87y8mdgryp.fsf@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0406242031020.8569@jurand.ds.pg.gda.pl> <mailpost.1088102121.25381@news-sj1-1>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
At Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:35:21 +0000 (UTC), "Maciej W. Rozycki" wrote:
>  Well, this is essentially what the patch does.  Or do you mean: "drop it
> and if anyone screams, consider an alternative?"  I'd find it acceptable,
> actually, but it's not my opinion that really matters here.

(it's fine w/ me.)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>