| To: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP... |
| From: | Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:39:42 +0100 |
| Cc: | cgd@broadcom.com, David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.55.0406222304340.23178@jurand.ds.pg.gda.pl> (Maciej W. Rozycki's message of "Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:30:48 +0200 (CEST)") |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <40C9F5A4.2050606@avtrex.com> <40C9F5FE.8030607@avtrex.com> <40C9F7F0.50501@avtrex.com> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0406112039040.13062@jurand.ds.pg.gda.pl> <mailpost.1086981251.16853@news-sj1-1> <yov57juduc7q.fsf@ldt-sj3-010.sj.broadcom.com> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0406222304340.23178@jurand.ds.pg.gda.pl> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> writes: > Or should we get rid of the 20-bit "break" completely? The two-argument > version provides the same functionality, although the 10-bit codes to be > used do not map to the 20-bit equivalent "optically" very well. > Especially if decimal notation is used. I notice no-one's really responded to this question yet. FWIW, on gut instinct, I'd personally prefer to drop the 20-bit break than introduce a new, non-standard name for it. Just an opinion though. I won't argue against anyone saying different. ;) Richard |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP..., Maciej W. Rozycki |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | non-contiguous physical memory, Yaron Presente |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP..., Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP..., Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |