linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP...

To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>
Subject: Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP...
From: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:39:42 +0100
Cc: cgd@broadcom.com, David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0406222304340.23178@jurand.ds.pg.gda.pl> (Maciej W. Rozycki's message of "Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:30:48 +0200 (CEST)")
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <40C9F5A4.2050606@avtrex.com> <40C9F5FE.8030607@avtrex.com> <40C9F7F0.50501@avtrex.com> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0406112039040.13062@jurand.ds.pg.gda.pl> <mailpost.1086981251.16853@news-sj1-1> <yov57juduc7q.fsf@ldt-sj3-010.sj.broadcom.com> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0406222304340.23178@jurand.ds.pg.gda.pl>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> writes:
>  Or should we get rid of the 20-bit "break" completely?  The two-argument
> version provides the same functionality, although the 10-bit codes to be
> used do not map to the 20-bit equivalent "optically" very well.  
> Especially if decimal notation is used.

I notice no-one's really responded to this question yet.  FWIW, on gut
instinct, I'd personally prefer to drop the 20-bit break than introduce
a new, non-standard name for it.

Just an opinion though.  I won't argue against anyone saying different. ;)

Richard

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>