[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP...

To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <>
Subject: Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP...
From: Richard Sandiford <>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:39:42 +0100
Cc:, David Daney <>, Ralf Baechle <>,,
In-reply-to: <> (Maciej W. Rozycki's message of "Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:30:48 +0200 (CEST)")
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <> <> <> <mailpost.1086981251.16853@news-sj1-1> <> <>
User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <> writes:
>  Or should we get rid of the 20-bit "break" completely?  The two-argument
> version provides the same functionality, although the 10-bit codes to be
> used do not map to the 20-bit equivalent "optically" very well.  
> Especially if decimal notation is used.

I notice no-one's really responded to this question yet.  FWIW, on gut
instinct, I'd personally prefer to drop the 20-bit break than introduce
a new, non-standard name for it.

Just an opinion though.  I won't argue against anyone saying different. ;)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>