| To: | David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP... |
| From: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Jun 2004 21:38:32 +0200 (CEST) |
| Cc: | cgd@broadcom.com, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com |
| In-reply-to: | <40D9DA3E.3040107@avtrex.com> |
| Organization: | Technical University of Gdansk |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <40C9F5A4.2050606@avtrex.com> <40C9F5FE.8030607@avtrex.com> <40C9F7F0.50501@avtrex.com> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0406112039040.13062@jurand.ds.pg.gda.pl> <mailpost.1086981251.16853@news-sj1-1> <yov57juduc7q.fsf@ldt-sj3-010.sj.broadcom.com> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0406222304340.23178@jurand.ds.pg.gda.pl> <40D9DA3E.3040107@avtrex.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, David Daney wrote: > Just out of curiosity, do you propose this patch in lieu of the patch to > Linux's traps.c? > > Or would you do both? Both. > It seems like both would be best, as there are already "broken" binutils > floating around out there. And broken binaries. -- + Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland + +--------------------------------------------------------------+ + e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available + |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP..., David Daney |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP..., Richard Sandiford |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP..., David Daney |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Patch] / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP..., Richard Sandiford |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |