linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Patch] (revised patch) / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP

To: David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] (revised patch) / 0 should send SIGFPE not SIGTRAP
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 10:33:13 +0200 (MEST)
Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl>, cgd@broadcom.com, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, Linux/MIPS Development <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>, binutils@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <40CA1FE3.9030507@avtrex.com>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <40C9F5A4.2050606@avtrex.com> <40C9F5FE.8030607@avtrex.com> <40C9F7F0.50501@avtrex.com> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0406112039040.13062@jurand.ds.pg.gda.pl> <mailpost.1086981251.16853@news-sj1-1> <yov57juduc7q.fsf@ldt-sj3-010.sj.broadcom.com> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0406112133380.13062@jurand.ds.pg.gda.pl> <40CA1B35.6010603@avtrex.com> <40CA1FE3.9030507@avtrex.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, David Daney wrote:
> David Daney wrote:
> > How about the attached (lightly tested) patch?
> >
> I will quit sending patches after this one.  It is equivalent to the
> previous version, except it uses the symbolic names of the break codes
> instead of the numeric values.

Please send one more, where you use `diff -up' :-)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                                                Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                                            -- Linus Torvalds

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>