| To: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IRQ problem on cobalt / 2.6.6 |
| From: | Peter Horton <phorton@bitbox.co.uk> |
| Date: | Wed, 19 May 2004 13:57:22 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.55.0405191318500.22609@jurand.ds.pg.gda.pl> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20040513183059.GA25743@getyour.pawsoff.org> <20040518073439.GA6818@skeleton-jack> <20040518205914.GA29574@getyour.pawsoff.org> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0405191318500.22609@jurand.ds.pg.gda.pl> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502) |
Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: We were getting interrupt 23 and calling do_IRQ() with a value of 9 (a bug, obviously). Interrupt 9 is masked so we get a "spurious 8259A interrupt" message.On Tue, 18 May 2004, Kieran Fulke wrote:alas, no joy.[...]VP_IDE: VIA vt82c586a (rev 27) IDE UDMA33 controller on pci0000:00:09.1 ide0: BM-DMA at 0x1420-0x1427, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:pio ide1: BM-DMA at 0x1428-0x142f, BIOS settings: hdc:pio, hdd:pio spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ9.Hmm, interesting. As the 8259A can only signal IRQ7 and possibly IRQ15 as spurious interrupts, this smells like a bug in 8259A handlers, regardless of system-specific problems you have. P. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: IRQ problem on cobalt / 2.6.6, Maciej W. Rozycki |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: CVS Update@-mips.org: linux, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: IRQ problem on cobalt / 2.6.6, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: IRQ problem on cobalt / 2.6.6, Kieran Fulke |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |