linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: uclibc mips ld.so and undefined symbols with nonzero symbol table en

To: "Bradley D. LaRonde" <brad@laronde.org>
Subject: Re: uclibc mips ld.so and undefined symbols with nonzero symbol table entry st_value
From: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 21:44:08 +0100
Cc: <uclibc@uclibc.org>, <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
In-reply-to: <87oeowkoa6.fsf@redhat.com> (Richard Sandiford's message of "Mon, 10 May 2004 21:41:53 +0100")
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <045b01c43155$1e06cd80$8d01010a@prefect> <874qqpg2ti.fsf@redhat.com> <012701c43607$83aa65f0$8d01010a@prefect> <87pt9cwwzu.fsf@redhat.com> <00e201c436b9$5fa0f450$8d01010a@prefect> <878yg0m9db.fsf@redhat.com> <01a901c436ce$7029d890$8d01010a@prefect> <87oeowkoa6.fsf@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux)
Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com> writes:
> "Bradley D. LaRonde" <brad@laronde.org> writes:
>> I read this in the spec:
>>
>>     All externally visible symbols, both defined and undefined,
>>     must be hashed into the hash table.
>>
>> Should libpthread's malloc stub be added to the hash table?
>
> Yes.

Or, to be more precise, the symbol should be added to the hash table.
The fact that the symbol is lazily bound doesn't matter.

Richard

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>