linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Raq2 & 2.6.4 : Strange output fro msomewhere

To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: Raq2 & 2.6.4 : Strange output fro msomewhere
From: Kumba <kumba@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 03:53:37 -0400
In-reply-to: <000301c42053$2ae67fe0$e60a0a0a@guendalin>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <000301c42053$2ae67fe0$e60a0a0a@guendalin>
Reply-to: kumba@gentoo.org
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
Massimo Cetra wrote:

Hi!

(i'm new here).
I have managed to compile CVS kernels for 2.6.4 and 2.4.25 trees on my
Raq2... And they work great.

Now...
Under heavy load (generating kernel_headers debian package), i saw the
following:

-cobalt:/proc# uptime
Unknown HZ value! (79) Assume 100.
 06:54:27 up 14 min,  2 users,  load average: 1.77, 1.37, 0.69
cobalt:/proc# sar 2 2
Linux 2.6.4 (cobalt)    04/12/04

06:54:32          CPU     %user     %nice   %system     %idle
06:54:34          all     18.31      0.00     81.69      0.00
06:54:36          all     16.67      0.00     83.33      0.00
Average:          all     17.60      0.00     82.40      0.00
cobalt:/proc# uname -a
Linux cobalt 2.6.4 #2 Mon Apr 12 05:50:49 CEST 2004 mips unknown
cobalt:/proc#


What is : "Unknown HZ value! (79) Assume 100." ????????????????????????

Thanks..

What does dmesg say your bogomips are? There's a patch that fixes a small calculation error. Without it, bogomips reports in at ~2,500, instead of 250. Call it a guess, but if you missed that patch, that might be your bug. Otherwise, I'm not too sure.


--Kumba

--
"Such is oft the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world: small hands do them because they must, while the eyes of the great are elsewhere." --Elrond

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>