| To: | Brian Murphy <brian@murphy.dk> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: BUG in pcnet32.c? |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Fri, 2 Apr 2004 10:39:00 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <406D240C.8020208@murphy.dk> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <4068809F.8070103@murphy.dk> <4068864D.1020209@realitydiluted.com> <406B2E90.5060307@murphy.dk> <20040401173154.GA30634@linux-mips.org> <406D240C.8020208@murphy.dk> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 10:27:56AM +0200, Brian Murphy wrote: > >The more information BUG or BUG_ON provide the bigger the kernel gets. > >Using a simple break instruction was simply the smallest thing. The > >previous, just slightly more verbose BUG() implementation did result > >in ~ 87k of bloat ... > > > > > Perhaps you could mention this usage of break explicitly in the message > in do_bp. That's easy, BUG() and BUG_ON() if the condition was met use a break instruction. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: BUG in pcnet32.c?, Brian Murphy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | strace on a linux/mips, Gleb O. Raiko |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: BUG in pcnet32.c?, Brian Murphy |
| Next by Thread: | strace on a linux/mips, Gleb O. Raiko |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |