Re: BUG in pcnet32.c?

To:	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject:	Re: BUG in pcnet32.c?
From:	Brian Murphy <brian@murphy.dk>
Date:	Fri, 02 Apr 2004 10:27:56 +0200
Cc:	linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to:	<20040401173154.GA30634@linux-mips.org>
Original-recipient:	rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References:	<4068809F.8070103@murphy.dk> <4068864D.1020209@realitydiluted.com> <406B2E90.5060307@murphy.dk> <20040401173154.GA30634@linux-mips.org>
Sender:	linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031107 Debian/1.5-3

Ralf Baechle wrote:

On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 10:48:16PM +0200, Brian Murphy wrote:

Not sure what you mean. I get the panic "Break instruction in kernelcode" from do_bp
in traps.c. This seems like a strange "assertion" to me...


The more information BUG or BUG_ON provide the bigger the kernel gets.
Using a simple break instruction was simply the smallest thing.  The
previous, just slightly more verbose BUG() implementation did result
in ~ 87k of bloat ...

Perhaps you could mention this usage of break explicitly in the messagein do_bp.


/Brian

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: BUG in pcnet32.c?, Geert Uytterhoeven Re: BUG in pcnet32.c?, Ralf Baechle Re: BUG in pcnet32.c?, Brian Murphy <= Re: BUG in pcnet32.c?, Ralf Baechle

Previous by Date:	Re: BUG in pcnet32.c?, Ralf Baechle
Next by Date:	Re: BUG in pcnet32.c?, Ralf Baechle
Previous by Thread:	Re: BUG in pcnet32.c?, Ralf Baechle
Next by Thread:	Re: BUG in pcnet32.c?, Ralf Baechle
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]