| To: | Brian Murphy <brian@murphy.dk> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: BUG in pcnet32.c? |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Thu, 1 Apr 2004 19:31:54 +0200 |
| Cc: | "Steven J. Hill" <sjhill@realitydiluted.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <406B2E90.5060307@murphy.dk> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <4068809F.8070103@murphy.dk> <4068864D.1020209@realitydiluted.com> <406B2E90.5060307@murphy.dk> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 10:48:16PM +0200, Brian Murphy wrote: > Not sure what you mean. I get the panic "Break instruction in kernel > code" from do_bp > in traps.c. This seems like a strange "assertion" to me... The more information BUG or BUG_ON provide the bigger the kernel gets. Using a simple break instruction was simply the smallest thing. The previous, just slightly more verbose BUG() implementation did result in ~ 87k of bloat ... Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: BUG in pcnet32.c?, Geert Uytterhoeven |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: BUG in pcnet32.c?, Brian Murphy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: BUG in pcnet32.c?, Geert Uytterhoeven |
| Next by Thread: | Re: BUG in pcnet32.c?, Brian Murphy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |