| To: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: MIPS Kernel size |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Tue, 3 Feb 2004 16:17:40 +0100 |
| Cc: | "Smith, Todd" <Todd.Smith@camc.org>, "'linux-mips@linux-mips.org'" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.55.0402031429130.16076@jurand.ds.pg.gda.pl> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <490E0430C3C72046ACF7F18B7CD76A2A56955E@KES.camcare.com> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0402031429130.16076@jurand.ds.pg.gda.pl> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 02:41:09PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > I like the idea of the -tiny tree and I hope that these changes get merged > > back into the main kernel tree. One of Linux's historic advantages is that > > it can run on older equipment but the trend seems to be supporting only > > current equipment > > I beg your pardon, but isn't the DECstation old enough? Somehow I'm just sitting in front of two Linux 2.6-supported desktops that are running pretty well :-) Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: MIPS Kernel size, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: MIPS Kernel size, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: MIPS Kernel size, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: MIPS Kernel size, Jan-Benedict Glaw |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |