| To: | "'linux-mips@linux-mips.org '" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: MIPS Kernel size |
| From: | "Smith, Todd" <Todd.Smith@camc.org> |
| Date: | Mon, 2 Feb 2004 11:12:10 -0500 |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
Hello Ralf, I am still interested in some older PDA usage that has limited resources. I certainly don't want to hold up or stop current kernel dev but is there a problem with keeping small kernel and/or userspace limits? Thank you for the discussion. Todd Smith <todd.smith@camc.org> -----Original Message----- From: Ralf Baechle Btw, the -tiny tree of 2.6 has been booted on a 2MB system. Supposedly that was an i386 system so MIPS16 should boot in an even smaller system and a normal 32-bit MIPS kernel should have enough space to wiggle in 4 megs. Does anybody on this list actually still care about that small systems? Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: CVS Update@-mips.org: linux, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [patch] pg-r4k.c cp0 hazards for R4000/R4400, Karsten Merker |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: MIPS Kernel size, Peter Horton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: MIPS Kernel size, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |