| To: | Ladislav Michl <ladis@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Removal of ____raw_readq() and ____raw_writeq() from asm-mips/io.h |
| From: | Jes Sorensen <jes@wildopensource.com> |
| Date: | 28 Jan 2004 05:49:58 -0500 |
| Cc: | Kevin Paul Herbert <kph@cisco.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20040128094032.GB900@kopretinka> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <1075255111.8744.4.camel@shakedown> <20040128094032.GB900@kopretinka> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
>>>>> "Ladislav" == Ladislav Michl <ladis@linux-mips.org> writes: Ladislav> On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 05:58:31PM -0800, Kevin Paul Herbert Ladislav> wrote: >> In edit 1.68, the non-interrupt locking versions of >> raw_readq()/raw_writeq() were removed, in favor of locking >> ones. While this makes sense in general, it breaks the compilation >> of the sb1250 which uses the non-locking versions (____raw_readq() >> and ____raw_writeq()) in interrupt handlers. Ladislav> Why was someone using these function at all? if you don't Ladislav> need locking simply do *reg_addr = val; ARGHHHHHHHHHH! If you are accessing memory mapped registers or memory on a PCI device, ie. likely on a 1250, you *must* use the readX/__raw_readX macros. Anybody just doing *reg = val on a PCI device should be banned from writing code for life! Jes |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Linux 2.6 on AMD Alchemy Au1500, Sylvain Munaut |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Marvell MV64340 documentation, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Removal of ____raw_readq() and ____raw_writeq() from asm-mips/io.h, Ladislav Michl |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Removal of ____raw_readq() and ____raw_writeq() from asm-mips/io.h, Ladislav Michl |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |