Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2

[Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>]

On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 19:26:43 +0100
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 12:03:51PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> 
> > It is.  Ralf already knows about the problem, I think - we leave
> > markers outside of functions which define an entry point, save some
> > additional registers to the stack, and try to fall through to the
> > following function.  If the function gets emitted elsewhere, obviously,
> > we've lost :)
> > 
> > [This is save_static_function...]
> 
> I only recently fixed the problem with the save_static() inline function
> which of course was fragile, speculating on the compiler doing the
> right thing ...  I'll cook up a fix ...

You can always use __attribute__((noinline))

-Andi