| To: | Charlie Brady <charlieb-linux-mips@e-smith.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Broadcom gcc changes (was Re: Broadcom 4702?) |
| From: | "John W. Linville" <linville@lvl7.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:25:25 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401151442590.17500-100000@allspice.nssg.mitel.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401151442590.17500-100000@allspice.nssg.mitel.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030425 |
Charlie Brady wrote: On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, John W. Linville wrote:I don't know about the 4710 or 4702 (I haven't got around to that yet), but the 4704 doesn't seem to need any special flags for building the kernel (or anything else).The acid test is not whether the kernel builds, but whether it runs correctly under all circumstances :-) Of course. But, "all circumstances" is difficult to test... :-)The BCM4704 kernels that I've been building seem to be running find, so far. Hopefully they will continue to do so... :-) John -- John W. Linville LVL7 Systems, Inc. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Broadcom gcc changes (was Re: Broadcom 4702?), Steven J. Hill |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Broadcom 4702?, Alan Cox |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Broadcom gcc changes (was Re: Broadcom 4702?), Steven J. Hill |
| Next by Thread: | Intel Pro 82546 chipset performance, Samuel Agarwal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |