| To: | Jim Thompson <jimt@vivato.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Broadcom gcc/binutils changes (was Re: Broadcom 4702?) |
| From: | Charlie Brady <charlieb-linux-mips@e-smith.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:50:02 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <61324177-46D5-11D8-9715-000393C30E1E@vivato.net> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Jim Thompson wrote: > My question is why these patches, which are subject to GPL (it is > binutils and gcc, after all), haven't been released. They have, which is why I know about them, and what they do. See URL in my post which started this thread. [What's released is unfortunately a tarball, not a patch. More work for us, I guess.] -- Charlie |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Broadcom 4702?, Jim Thompson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Broadcom gcc/binutils mods (Re: Broadcom 4702?), Charlie Brady |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Broadcom 4702?, ilya |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Broadcom 4702?, Jun Sun |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |