| To: | Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Broadcom 4702? |
| From: | Jim Thompson <jimt@vivato.net> |
| Date: | Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:42:01 -0800 |
| Cc: | Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Charlie Brady <charlieb-linux-mips@e-smith.com> |
| In-reply-to: | <1074114950.403.8.camel@dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401141546230.21734-100000@allspice.nssg.mitel.com> <61324177-46D5-11D8-9715-000393C30E1E@vivato.net> <1074114950.403.8.camel@dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
I have binaries. I asked. I was told "no". On Jan 14, 2004, at 1:15 PM, Alan Cox wrote: On Mer, 2004-01-14 at 21:05, Jim Thompson wrote:My question is why these patches, which are subject to GPL (it is binutils and gcc, after all), haven't been released.There is no obligation for anyone to provide the source except to those they provide the binaries. They just can't stop those people then redistributing it. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Broadcom 4702?, Alan Cox |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Broadcom gcc/binutils changes (was Re: Broadcom 4702?), Charlie Brady |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Broadcom 4702?, Alan Cox |
| Next by Thread: | Broadcom gcc/binutils mods (Re: Broadcom 4702?), Charlie Brady |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |