| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: How stable is 2.6 on a SB1250 processor? |
| From: | Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:02:27 -0800 |
| Cc: | Dimitri Torfs <dimitri@sonycom.com>, Pete Popov <ppopov@mvista.com>, kph@cisco.com, Linux MIPS mailing list <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>, jsun@mvista.com |
| In-reply-to: | <20040113224552.GA6001@linux-mips.org>; from ralf@linux-mips.org on Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 11:45:52PM +0100 |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <1074027809.20636.91.camel@shakedown> <1074028164.21857.120.camel@zeus.mvista.com> <20040113214454.GA2737@sonycom.com> <20040113143137.N11733@mvista.com> <20040113224552.GA6001@linux-mips.org> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 11:45:52PM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 02:31:37PM -0800, Jun Sun wrote: > > > What is troubling me most is either rockhopper nor malta works on 2.6. > > I have a success report with 2.6 on Malta from yesterday. I'll check if > any patching was required but I'm interested in your Malta's configuration. > Here is the config I am using ... with access_ok() fix. Jun
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: How stable is 2.6 on a SB1250 processor?, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Intel Pro 82546 chipset performance, Samuel Agarwal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: How stable is 2.6 on a SB1250 processor?, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: How stable is 2.6 on a SB1250 processor?, Kevin Paul Herbert |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
