| To: | Dimitri Torfs <dimitri@sonycom.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: How stable is 2.6 on a SB1250 processor? |
| From: | Jun Sun <jsun@mvista.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:31:37 -0800 |
| Cc: | Pete Popov <ppopov@mvista.com>, kph@cisco.com, Linux MIPS mailing list <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>, jsun@mvista.com |
| In-reply-to: | <20040113214454.GA2737@sonycom.com>; from dimitri@sonycom.com on Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 10:44:54PM +0100 |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <1074027809.20636.91.camel@shakedown> <1074028164.21857.120.camel@zeus.mvista.com> <20040113214454.GA2737@sonycom.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 10:44:54PM +0100, Dimitri Torfs wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 01:09:25PM -0800, Pete Popov wrote: > > > > I think userland is still broken. Ralf was working on the access_ok > > problem the last time I talked to him. > > > > Yes, if it's a 32-bit kernel then it's definitely broken. You might want > to check out > http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2004-01/msg00000.html. > > After that fix, user space stuff started to work for me. > Yes, that is a temporary fix for the problem. bcm1250 PCI still have issues though. I have not looked into it. What is troubling me most is either rockhopper nor malta works on 2.6. With rockhopper I had to disable cache in order to run. I suspect there is something fundamental still not quite right, possibly only affecting cache noncoherent systems. More debugging fun ... Jun |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Broadcom 4702?, Jun Sun |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: How stable is 2.6 on a SB1250 processor?, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: How stable is 2.6 on a SB1250 processor?, Dimitri Torfs |
| Next by Thread: | Re: How stable is 2.6 on a SB1250 processor?, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |