| To: | Pete Popov <ppopov@mvista.com>, kph@cisco.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: How stable is 2.6 on a SB1250 processor? |
| From: | Dimitri Torfs <dimitri@sonycom.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:44:54 +0100 |
| Cc: | Linux MIPS mailing list <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
| In-reply-to: | <1074028164.21857.120.camel@zeus.mvista.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <1074027809.20636.91.camel@shakedown> <1074028164.21857.120.camel@zeus.mvista.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 01:09:25PM -0800, Pete Popov wrote: > > I think userland is still broken. Ralf was working on the access_ok > problem the last time I talked to him. > Yes, if it's a 32-bit kernel then it's definitely broken. You might want to check out http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2004-01/msg00000.html. After that fix, user space stuff started to work for me. Dimitri -- Dimitri Torfs | NSCE dimitri@sonycom.com | The Corporate Village tel: +32 2 7008541 | Da Vincilaan 7 - D1 fax: +32 2 7008622 | B-1935 Zaventem - Belgium |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: How stable is 2.6 on a SB1250 processor?, Pete Popov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Broadcom 4702?, Charlie Brady |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: How stable is 2.6 on a SB1250 processor?, Pete Popov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: How stable is 2.6 on a SB1250 processor?, Jun Sun |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |