linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.5 n32 syscall numbers are wrong

To: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
Subject: Re: 2.5 n32 syscall numbers are wrong
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 01:25:50 +0100
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <20031223175732.GA26052@nevyn.them.org>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20031223175732.GA26052@nevyn.them.org>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 12:57:32PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> If you take a look at scall64-n32.S, you'll find that there's no hole after
> sendfile64.  But in <asm/unistd.h> there is.  So glibc gets built with the
> wrong number for clock_gettime and confusion ensues...

Applied.  I also fixed __NR_Linux_syscalls and __NR_N32_Linux_syscalls
which also were off by one but didn't get fixed by your patch.

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>