| To: | Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.5 n32 syscall numbers are wrong |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Mon, 29 Dec 2003 01:25:50 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20031223175732.GA26052@nevyn.them.org> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20031223175732.GA26052@nevyn.them.org> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 12:57:32PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > If you take a look at scall64-n32.S, you'll find that there's no hole after > sendfile64. But in <asm/unistd.h> there is. So glibc gets built with the > wrong number for clock_gettime and confusion ensues... Applied. I also fixed __NR_Linux_syscalls and __NR_N32_Linux_syscalls which also were off by one but didn't get fixed by your patch. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: What toolchain for vr4181, Geert Uytterhoeven |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Origin 200, Phil Frost |
| Previous by Thread: | 2.5 n32 syscall numbers are wrong, Daniel Jacobowitz |
| Next by Thread: | Origin 200, Maitland Bottoms |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |