[Top] [All Lists]

Re: How reliable is GCC-3.3.1 wrt building mipsel-linux kernel?

Subject: Re: How reliable is GCC-3.3.1 wrt building mipsel-linux kernel?
From: Jan-Benedict Glaw <>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:25:43 +0100
In-reply-to: <>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <> <>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
On Wed, 2003-11-19 16:29:43 -0800, David Daney <>
wrote in message <>:
> Ralf Baechle wrote:
> >On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 05:40:31PM -0800, David Daney wrote:

> Which options have other people used with gcc 3.3.1 with good results?

It's a question of what you call "good results". If there are bugs in
the kernel sources which only show up with a really aggressive HEAD
compiler, then IMHO it's a good result to see the compiled kernel crash,
just because there actually *is* a bug.

Companies however tend to accept a slower/more bloated/whatever software
(produced by an older compiler) in order not to start hunting down the
remaining (and possibly hard to find) bugs...


   Jan-Benedict Glaw    . +49-172-7608481
   "Eine Freie Meinung in  einem Freien Kopf    | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg
    fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! |   im Irak!
   ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>