| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: How reliable is GCC-3.3.1 wrt building mipsel-linux kernel? |
| From: | David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:29:43 -0800 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20031119233023.GA30962@linux-mips.org> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <3FBACA0F.7070207@avtrex.com> <20031119233023.GA30962@linux-mips.org> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 |
Ralf Baechle wrote: On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 05:40:31PM -0800, David Daney wrote:<...>But my main question is this: Have other people experienced miscompilation (ie bad code generation) with gcc 3.3.1?Quite frequently using a new, possibly more agressive compiler triggers bugs in the kernel code ... Ralf That's the whole point of my question. Which options have other people used with gcc 3.3.1 with good results? David Daney. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: How reliable is GCC-3.3.1 wrt building mipsel-linux kernel?, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | rtc_ds1742_wait, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: How reliable is GCC-3.3.1 wrt building mipsel-linux kernel?, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: How reliable is GCC-3.3.1 wrt building mipsel-linux kernel?, Jan-Benedict Glaw |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |