| To: | David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: How reliable is GCC-3.3.1 wrt building mipsel-linux kernel? |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Thu, 20 Nov 2003 00:30:23 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <3FBACA0F.7070207@avtrex.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <3FBACA0F.7070207@avtrex.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 05:40:31PM -0800, David Daney wrote: > The subject line kind of says it all. > > We are running linux 2.4.18 on a mips4Kc core (ATI Xilleon 225) and find > it to be quite stable when compiled with gcc 2.96/binutils 2.11.92.0.10 > > When the kernel is compiled with gcc 3.3.1/binutils 2.14.90.0.5 it also > seems to be quite stable, except for when one certian driver is used > (basically an mpeg decoder driver). Under certian conditions the system > seems to "freeze" (no messages printed anywhere and only a hard reset > will recover). > > Yeah that is a good bug report... > > But my main question is this: Have other people experienced > miscompilation (ie bad code generation) with gcc 3.3.1? Quite frequently using a new, possibly more agressive compiler triggers bugs in the kernel code ... Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: How reliable is GCC-3.3.1 wrt building mipsel-linux kernel?, Daniel Jacobowitz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: How reliable is GCC-3.3.1 wrt building mipsel-linux kernel?, David Daney |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: How reliable is GCC-3.3.1 wrt building mipsel-linux kernel?, Daniel Jacobowitz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: How reliable is GCC-3.3.1 wrt building mipsel-linux kernel?, David Daney |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |