| To: | macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: mips64 cpu-probe.c compile failure |
| From: | Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Date: | Fri, 19 Sep 2003 23:21:23 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.GSO.3.96.1030919132308.9134B-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
| Organization: | TOSHIBA Personal Computer System Corporation |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20030918.232202.07646481.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1030919132308.9134B-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
>>>>> On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 13:55:45 +0200 (MET DST), "Maciej W. Rozycki" >>>>> <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> said: macro> Well, the asm statement requires immediates, so if macros are macro> used variables won't work anyway, but the the code will look macro> more obscurely. Yes, though variables won't work anyway, the inline function looks like it can accept variables (for careless reader). But that's just my impression. macro> It looks like gcc insists on forcing the constants into macro> registers. The following patch should work for gcc 3.x. A few macro> warnings will still be emitted, but the code will get build macro> properly. Thanks. It works fine with gcc 3.3.1. --- Atsushi Nemoto |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: list archive, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: recent binutils and mips64-linux, Eric Christopher |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: mips64 cpu-probe.c compile failure, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Next by Thread: | How disable CONFIG_PCI, Prabhakar Kalasani |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |