On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > Is it OK for other PCI systems?
>
> Yes, I think so. Those two functions seem to have migrated in from
> pci-hplj.c; they can't possibly compile, since they use constants only
> defined in that file.
Then the snippet should probably get removed altogether.
> > Why do you want these suffixes? They don't work for assembly sources.
>
> Because otherwise uses of XKPHYS in a 32-bit kernel generate noisy
> warnings. I don't remember where it was offhand. Wrap it in
> __ASSEMBLY__ if you like.
Hmm, but is there any use for XKPHYS, etc. in a 32-bit kernel at all?
The address cannot effectively be used anyway.
--
+ Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland +
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available +
|