| To: | "??(zhufeng)" <zhufeng@koretide.com.cn> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Can gcc support mips-pe now? |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Sep 2003 11:24:19 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <MGEELAPMEFMLFBMDBLKLEEGFCFAA.zhufeng@koretide.com.cn> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <3F5D2141.4050002@avtrex.com> <MGEELAPMEFMLFBMDBLKLEEGFCFAA.zhufeng@koretide.com.cn> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 09:06:44AM +0800, ??(zhufeng) wrote: That's a binutils problem, if at all. Again, Linux isn't Windows, we don't need PECOFF. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: about dlltool.exe, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | NFS Server and Client Setup on MIPS Platform, Adeel Malik |
| Previous by Thread: | Can gcc support mips-pe now?, ??(zhufeng) |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PATCH: avoid glibc conflict, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |