On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Jun Sun wrote:
> I am completely lost in your arguments. Let us keep it to the basic.
>
> Tell me what is wrong with the following, and why your proposal
> is better than this:
>
> 1) get rid of calibrate_*() function
> 2) introduce a generic counter frequence calibration routine, which
> is only invoked when mips_counter_frequency is 0.
> 3) If any board is not happy with this calibration, it is free to
> do its calibration in board_timer_init(), which would set
> mips_counter_frequency to be non-zero.
So I am lost, too. What I proposed with the patch is exactly what you
describe above. So what's wrong with it?
--
+ Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland +
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available +
|