linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: udelay

from [Ralf Baechle] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Pete Popov <ppopov@mvista.com>
Subject: Re: udelay
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 03:41:32 +0200
Cc: Linux MIPS mailing list <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
In-reply-to: <1059788948.9224.62.camel@zeus.mvista.com>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <1059788948.9224.62.camel@zeus.mvista.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i 
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 06:49:08PM -0700, Pete Popov wrote:

> Looks like the latest udelay in 2.4 is borked. Anyway else notice that
> problem?  I did a 10 sec test: mdelay works, udelay is broken, at least
> for the CPU and toolchain I'm using.

That just doesn't make sense.  Mdelay is based on udelay so if udelay
is broken mdelay should be broken, too.

  Ralf
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: udelay, Kumba
Next by Date:  Re: RM7k cache_flush_sigtramp, Fuxin Zhang
Previous by Thread:  Re: udelay, Kumba
Next by Thread:  Re: udelay, Pete Popov
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]