linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: sead_int.c

from [Ralf Baechle] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: David Kesselring <dkesselr@mmc.atmel.com>
Subject: Re: sead_int.c
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 18:52:50 +0200
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0308011043090.7852-100000@ares.mmc.atmel.com>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0308011043090.7852-100000@ares.mmc.atmel.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i 
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 10:47:51AM -0400, David Kesselring wrote:

> Tell me if I'm incorrect but it looks like this for condition is wrong.
> There are only 2 defined irqs.
> 
>       for (i = 0; i <= SEADINT_END; i++)
>                     ^^        should be just < ??

Looks like you're right ...

  Ralf
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • sead_int.c, David Kesselring
    • Re: sead_int.c, Ralf Baechle <=
Previous by Date:  Re: udelay, Geert Uytterhoeven
Next by Date:  Re: RM7k cache_flush_sigtramp, Ralf Baechle
Previous by Thread:  sead_int.c, David Kesselring
Next by Thread:  udelay, Pete Popov
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]