| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RM7k cache_flush_sigtramp |
| From: | Fuxin Zhang <fxzhang@ict.ac.cn> |
| Date: | Fri, 01 Aug 2003 12:59:00 +0800 |
| Cc: | Adam Kiepul <Adam_Kiepul@pmc-sierra.com>, MAKE FUN PRANK CALLS <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
| In-reply-to: | <20030801030110.GD4197@linux-mips.org> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <9DFF23E1E33391449FDC324526D1F259017DF087@SJC1EXM02> <3F29B6EE.5070207@ict.ac.cn> <20030801030110.GD4197@linux-mips.org> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 |
I am using a slightly modified 2.4.21-pre4,based on cvs of early this
month(?).
We have merged with latest cvs, I will run it and report the result tonight. Ralf Baechle wrote: Adam, On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 08:40:14AM +0800, Fuxin Zhang wrote:Current linux code does exactly this. But I was seeing all kinds of faults occuring around the sigreturn point on the stack without a sync? And a sync does greatly improve the stablity.The ordering does matter however since the Hit_Invalidate_I makes sure the write buffer is flushed.could there be an errata explaining Fuxin's findings? Fuxin, what version are you running? Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RM7k cache_flush_sigtramp, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: RM7k cache_flush_sigtramp, Dominic Sweetman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RM7k cache_flush_sigtramp, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | RE: RM7k cache_flush_sigtramp, Dominic Sweetman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |