| To: | Fuxin Zhang <fxzhang@ict.ac.cn> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RM7k cache_flush_sigtramp |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Fri, 1 Aug 2003 05:01:11 +0200 |
| Cc: | Adam Kiepul <Adam_Kiepul@pmc-sierra.com>, MAKE FUN PRANK CALLS <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
| In-reply-to: | <3F29B6EE.5070207@ict.ac.cn> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <9DFF23E1E33391449FDC324526D1F259017DF087@SJC1EXM02> <3F29B6EE.5070207@ict.ac.cn> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
Adam, On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 08:40:14AM +0800, Fuxin Zhang wrote: > Current linux code does exactly this. But I was seeing all kinds of > faults occuring around the > sigreturn point on the stack without a sync? And a sync does greatly > improve the stablity. > > >The ordering does matter however since the Hit_Invalidate_I makes sure the > >write buffer is flushed. could there be an errata explaining Fuxin's findings? Fuxin, what version are you running? Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RM7k cache_flush_sigtramp, Fuxin Zhang |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RM7k cache_flush_sigtramp, Fuxin Zhang |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RM7k cache_flush_sigtramp, Fuxin Zhang |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RM7k cache_flush_sigtramp, Fuxin Zhang |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |