| To: | David Kesselring <dkesselr@mmc.atmel.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 64bit Sead build |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Jul 2003 14:48:39 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.GSO.4.44.0307220836390.16466-100000@ares.mmc.atmel.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20030721233649.GA6900@linux-mips.org> <Pine.GSO.4.44.0307220836390.16466-100000@ares.mmc.atmel.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 08:40:30AM -0400, David Kesselring wrote: > Thanks for the info. I'm trying to build 64bit sead so that it can be a > basis for a port to our own chip with a MIPS 5kf core. Is one of the other > supported boards more generic (and thus a better start) than Sead? We more regularly test on Malta which I also consider a way more friendly test and development environment than SEAD which is sort of a bare bone board. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 64bit Sead build, David Kesselring |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 64bit Sead build, Dominic Sweetman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 64bit Sead build, David Kesselring |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 64bit Sead build, Dominic Sweetman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |