|To:||"Maciej W. Rozycki" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, <email@example.com>|
|Subject:||Re: CVS Update@-mips.org: linux|
|From:||"Kevin D. Kissell" <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||Mon, 21 Jul 2003 14:12:07 +0200|
> Any justifiable reason for getting rid of arch/mips64? In my opinion, it should never have existed. The vast majority of MIPS-specific kernel code can be identical for 32-bit and 64-bit versions of the architecture. Creating arch/mips64 (as opposed to arch/mips/mips64 or Ralf's arch/mips/mm-64) caused duplication of modules that then needed to be maintained in parallel - but which often were not.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|