| To: | fpga dsp <fpga_dsp@yahoo.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: schedule() and mipsel processor |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Sun, 29 Jun 2003 19:35:23 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20030628025749.40346.qmail@web41205.mail.yahoo.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20030628025749.40346.qmail@web41205.mail.yahoo.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 12:57:49PM +1000, fpga dsp wrote: > I may ask a stupid question here but I have problem of calling any functions > such as interruptible_sleep_on_timeout, sleep_on ... in a timer handler, the > kernel just crash straight away in the function schedule(). Now I go and do a > diff between kern/sched.c on i686 source and mipsel source. clearly , they > are different. So the question is from kernel programming point of view, the > bottom-half of interrupt handler is still considered interrupt handler? I > don't see any platform dependent code in the scheduler at all. So why a mips > scheduler is different from intel scheduler ? Bs. There was no need to change kernel/sched.c at all so you're probably simply diffing the wrong versions. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] MIPS DEC/SGI Linux logo, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Which toolchain? Trouble at kernel-starting, Achim Hensel |
| Previous by Thread: | schedule() and mipsel processor, fpga dsp |
| Next by Thread: | Re: schedule() and mipsel processor, Jun Sun |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |