|Subject:||schedule() and mipsel processor|
|From:||fpga dsp <email@example.com>|
|Date:||Sat, 28 Jun 2003 12:57:49 +1000 (EST)|
I may ask a stupid question here but I have problem of calling any functions such as interruptible_sleep_on_timeout, sleep_on ... in a timer handler, the kernel just crash straight away in the function schedule(). Now I go and do a diff between kern/sched.c on i686 source and mipsel source. clearly , they are different. So the question is from kernel programming point of view, the bottom-half of interrupt handler is still considered interrupt handler? I don't see any platform dependent code in the scheduler at all. So why a mips scheduler is different from intel scheduler ?
- Check & compose your email via SMS on your Telstra or Vodafone mobile.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|