| To: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | schedule() and mipsel processor |
| From: | fpga dsp <fpga_dsp@yahoo.com.au> |
| Date: | Sat, 28 Jun 2003 12:57:49 +1000 (EST) |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
|
Hi all,
I may ask a stupid question here but I have problem of calling any functions such as interruptible_sleep_on_timeout, sleep_on ... in a timer handler, the kernel just crash straight away in the function schedule(). Now I go and do a diff between kern/sched.c on i686 source and mipsel source. clearly , they are different. So the question is from kernel programming point of view, the bottom-half of interrupt handler is still considered interrupt handler? I don't see any platform dependent code in the scheduler at all. So why a mips scheduler is different from intel scheduler ?
Many thanks
Duy Do Yahoo! Mobile - Check & compose your email via SMS on your Telstra or Vodafone mobile. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: KGDB problem, Jun Sun |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] au1000_eth.c - Dave Jones, Pete Popov |
| Previous by Thread: | KGDB problem, Patrick Hilt |
| Next by Thread: | Re: schedule() and mipsel processor, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |