| To: | "Ralf Baechle" <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: wired tlb entry? |
| From: | "Joseph Chiu" <joseph@omnilux.net> |
| Date: | Wed, 25 Jun 2003 11:05:49 -0700 |
| Cc: | "Pete Popov" <ppopov@mvista.com>, "Linux MIPS mailing list" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
| Importance: | Normal |
| In-reply-to: | <20030625045916.GA28556@linux-mips.org> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Tuesday, June 24, 2003 9:59 PM Ralf Baechle wrote: > Usual warning - wired entries are almost always a bad idea. TLB entries > are a scarce resource and wiring will reduce the number available for > random replacement even further raising the amount of CPU burned in the > TLB reload handler. Thanks Ralf. It is "just one" wired global TLB entry (admiteddly, out of a paltry 32). Using the wired entry has fixed the immediate problem at hand, so I decided it's worth it for now. Joseph |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: is there any docs/manuals for linker scripts symbols, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Booting Kernel on RM200, Michael Gruetzner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: wired tlb entry?, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: wired tlb entry?, Steven J. Hill |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |