On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 16:09:10 +0200 (MET DST), "Maciej W. Rozycki"
> >>>>> <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> said:
> >> Thank you for pointing out this. I did not think very much. But
> >> you mean "slt \tmp, \tmp, \ptr", don't you?
>
> macro> Not at all. Why would I want to reverse the comparison?
>
> Sorry, I garbled. Please ignore my last patch. Your patch works
> fine. Thank you again.
Ralf, OK to apply then?
--
+ Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland +
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
+ e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available +
patch-mips-2.4.21-pre4-20030505-load_kpte2-0
diff -up --recursive --new-file
linux-mips-2.4.21-pre4-20030505.macro/arch/mips64/mm/tlbex-r4k.S
linux-mips-2.4.21-pre4-20030505/arch/mips64/mm/tlbex-r4k.S
--- linux-mips-2.4.21-pre4-20030505.macro/arch/mips64/mm/tlbex-r4k.S
2003-04-27 02:56:39.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-mips-2.4.21-pre4-20030505/arch/mips64/mm/tlbex-r4k.S 2003-06-03
12:54:41.000000000 +0000
@@ -73,8 +73,9 @@
* Determine that fault address is within vmalloc range.
*/
dla \tmp, ekptbl
- sltu \tmp, \ptr, \tmp
+ slt \tmp, \ptr, \tmp
beqz \tmp, \not_vmalloc # not vmalloc
+ nop
.endm
|