Re: [PATCH] Vr41xx unaligned access update

[Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>]

On Fri, 23 May 2003, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Fri, 23 May 2003, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > @@ -145,8 +146,6 @@
> >      * but the BD bit in the cause register is not set.
> >      */
> >     case bcond_op:
> > -   case j_op:
> > -   case jal_op:
> >     case beq_op:
> >     case bne_op:
> >     case blez_op:
> > @@ -155,7 +154,11 @@
> >     case bnel_op:
> >     case blezl_op:
> >     case bgtzl_op:
> > -   case jalx_op:
> > +           if (branch) {
> > +               /* branch in a branch delay slot */
> > +               goto sigill;
> > +           }
> > +           branch = 1;
> >             pc += 4;
> >             goto retry;
> 
>  Hmm, what tree is it against?  I can't see code matching these hunks in
> our tree at linux-mips.org.

Check out the 2.4.x branch. I did verify that all patches apply.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                                                Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                                            -- Linus Torvalds