| To: | Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18 |
| From: | Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org> |
| Date: | Wed, 14 May 2003 23:55:07 -0400 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Guido Guenther <agx@sigxcpu.org> |
| In-reply-to: | <20030513195928.GB16497@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20030318154155.GF2613@bogon.ms20.nix> <20030318160303.GN13122@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20030318174241.GG2613@bogon.ms20.nix> <20030318190841.GO13122@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20030318232454.GA19990@bogon.ms20.nix> <20030319001652.GB19189@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20030513113316.GU3889@bogon.ms20.nix> <20030513192735.GA16497@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20030513193625.GA14066@nevyn.them.org> <20030513195928.GB16497@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.1i |
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 09:59:28PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > [snip] > > > > Just for completeness: I had to use: > > > > GCCFLAGS += -mabi=32 -march=r4600 -mtune=r4600 -Wa,--trap > > > > to make gcc-3.3 happy (note the 32 instead of o32). > > > > > > Yes, IIRC 64 vs. n64 has the same problem. > > > > That's not quite the same: 64 is o64, n64 is n64. > > I don't think so (There's -mabi=o64). > Otherwise I would have built all my NewABI 64bit Executables as > o64 without noticing ever. :-) You are, of course, right :) > > GCC's never called the 32-bit ABI "o32". > > True, but it might be clearer if it did. I suppose... too late now. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Power On Self Test and testing memory, Lyle Bainbridge |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18, Thiemo Seufer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18, Guido Guenther |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |