| To: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18 |
| From: | Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> |
| Date: | Wed, 14 May 2003 20:42:56 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.GSO.3.96.1030514195854.26213L-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20030514175011.GD8833@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <Pine.GSO.3.96.1030514195854.26213L-100000@delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4i |
Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: [snip] > > What's desireable here depends on the target system. For Linux, > > the current way is IMHO the best: o32 only for mips-linux, and > > o32, n32 and n64 for mips64-linux, with n32 as default. > > Of course the choice of the default should be configurable (for binutils > it probably already is It isn't, and probably will never be. Of course you could introduce just another configuration, with the bfd vector of your choice as default. > -- I recall Richard Sandiford making changes in > this area, for gcc -- no idea). It would also need a different config which defines a different MIPS_DEFAULT_ABI. Thiemo |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: r4k Indigo 1 (was Re: Branch relocation fixing at Kernel-compiling with Debian-toolchain), Guido Guenther |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: r4k Indigo 1 (was Re: Branch relocation fixing at Kernel-compiling with Debian-toolchain), Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |