| To: | Guido Guenther <agx@sigxcpu.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18 |
| From: | Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> |
| Date: | Tue, 13 May 2003 22:50:21 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20030513201144.GY3889@bogon.ms20.nix> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20030318154155.GF2613@bogon.ms20.nix> <20030318160303.GN13122@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20030318174241.GG2613@bogon.ms20.nix> <20030318190841.GO13122@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20030318232454.GA19990@bogon.ms20.nix> <20030319001652.GB19189@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20030513113316.GU3889@bogon.ms20.nix> <20030513192735.GA16497@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20030513201144.GY3889@bogon.ms20.nix> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4i |
Guido Guenther wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 09:27:35PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > Guido Guenther wrote: > [..snip..] > > > to make gcc-3.3 happy (note the 32 instead of o32). > > > > Yes, IIRC 64 vs. n64 has the same problem. > I think 64 is o64 not n64. Strange, you are now the second to say so. Where does this idea stem from? I just had a look at the gcc sources, the mips*-linux config doesn't support o64 at all. Thiemo |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18, Guido Guenther |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18, Guido Guenther |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18, Guido Guenther |
| Next by Thread: | Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18, Guido Guenther |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |