linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18

To: Guido Guenther <agx@sigxcpu.org>
Subject: Re: -mcpu vs. binutils 2.13.90.0.18
From: Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 22:50:21 +0200
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <20030513201144.GY3889@bogon.ms20.nix>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20030318154155.GF2613@bogon.ms20.nix> <20030318160303.GN13122@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20030318174241.GG2613@bogon.ms20.nix> <20030318190841.GO13122@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20030318232454.GA19990@bogon.ms20.nix> <20030319001652.GB19189@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20030513113316.GU3889@bogon.ms20.nix> <20030513192735.GA16497@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20030513201144.GY3889@bogon.ms20.nix>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i
Guido Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 09:27:35PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > Guido Guenther wrote:
> [..snip..] 
> > > to make gcc-3.3 happy (note the 32 instead of o32).
> > 
> > Yes, IIRC 64 vs. n64 has the same problem.
> I think 64 is o64 not n64.

Strange, you are now the second to say so. Where does this idea stem from?

I just had a look at the gcc sources, the mips*-linux config doesn't
support o64 at all.


Thiemo

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>